Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Plant-based Foods and their Environmental Footprint
In a previous post, we looked at the
environmental footprint of meat production (mainly cattle). But, after I
embarked on my one-day vegan journey on World Food Day, I began to
wonder, what does it take to produce plant-based foods? Is veganism feasible
here in Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) as a mainstream diet?
Well, regardless of the crop, in order to grow it, we need space. Traditional and modern agriculture, both practised in T&T, involve clearing of land. This means that trees will be cut down and animals will lose their habitats. So, I guess it is true to say that it is inevitable for humans to exist without harming the environment in some way.
The production of rice, a staple my family and I eat daily, contributes large amounts of methane (a potent greenhouse gas-GHG) to the atmosphere, due to the swampy conditions in which it is grown. So, we can't say that livestock is the only culprit of large-scale methane production.
Further, almonds (including almond milk), which many vegans consume regularly, use tonnes of water in their production. Fulton & Norton (2018) have found that it takes 12 litres (3.2 gallons) of water to produce one almond in California (a large-scale producer of almonds)!
Meat and
animal products are part of our rich Caribbean culture. From cow heel soup to
curried chicken, meat plays a part in many of our festivities. Animal products
are important in many religious ceremonies like Eid-ul-Adha (when cows and
goats are sacrificed and eaten), Hindu prayers (where milk is distributed
to gathered worshippers in the temple), as well as Christmas celebrations (we love some good beef
pastelles!).
So, as much
as we want to help the environment, meat is also a crucial part of our lives,
especially for farmers who rely on livestock production for income. In the
journal Elementa, Peters &
Picardy (2016) say that “Empirical evidence shows that consumption of meat and
dairy products increases as a country’s per capita income increases.”
Other issues
still arise with veganism as the “ultimate climate diet”. Remember that a diet
is supposed to meat one’s nutritional needs, but vegans don’t often get the
critical nutrients that one can derive from animal-based protein (Kirshenbaum & Vega, 2019). In fact,
many vegans take vitamin B supplements since they don’t eat meat, which is rich
in this essential nutrient.
Taking all
this international research with a ‘grain of salt’ as it relates to meat
production here in T&T, and based on my previous posts, I would say that we
need to ‘meat our targets’. In other
words, we don’t all need to be vegans, but we can reduce the amount of meat
that we eat, by say, going vegetarian for 1 day a week, or reducing our portion
sizes of meat. Perhaps we can replace red meats with chicken (which produces
less GHGs in its production).
So what do you say? Can you meat these goals?
[1] Check out the video below for more information on rethinking veganism!
Well, regardless of the crop, in order to grow it, we need space. Traditional and modern agriculture, both practised in T&T, involve clearing of land. This means that trees will be cut down and animals will lose their habitats. So, I guess it is true to say that it is inevitable for humans to exist without harming the environment in some way.
The production of rice, a staple my family and I eat daily, contributes large amounts of methane (a potent greenhouse gas-GHG) to the atmosphere, due to the swampy conditions in which it is grown. So, we can't say that livestock is the only culprit of large-scale methane production.
![]() |
Photo of rice farming by Niphon Smitthapipat |
Further, almonds (including almond milk), which many vegans consume regularly, use tonnes of water in their production. Fulton & Norton (2018) have found that it takes 12 litres (3.2 gallons) of water to produce one almond in California (a large-scale producer of almonds)!
![]() |
Photo of almonds and almond milk by rawpixel.com from Pexels |
Rethinking Veganism
Veganism is not feasible everywhere. Land that is unsuitable for planting crops is often used to graze animals. Therefore, completely cutting out animal products from the diet will effectively waste this land and feed less people. Also, if there is a decreased demand for animal products, many cattle farmers and even national economies will fall since they depend on cattle sales. Guyana also relies on rice production as a major source of income. [1]
'Meating our Targets'
So what do you say? Can you meat these goals?
[1] Check out the video below for more information on rethinking veganism!
REFERENCES
1. Our Changing Climate. (2018, February 2). Here's why we need to rethink veganism [Video]. Youtube. https://tinyurl.com/yyzp6f3h
2. Kirshenbaum, S. & Vega, K. (Producers). (2019, February 7). Red meat, us, and the environment [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/podcasts/598860638/serving-up-science
3. Fulton, J., Norton, M. & Shilling, F. (2018). Water-indexed benefits and impacts of California almonds. Ecological Indicators, 96 (1), 711-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.063
4. Carlsson-Kanyama,
A., Gonzáles, A. D. (2009). Potential contributions of food consumption
patterns to climate change. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
89(5), 1704S-1709S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736AA
5. Peters, C.J., Picardy, J., Darrouzet-Nardi, A. F., Wilkins, J.L., Griffin, T.S. & Fick, G.W. (2016). Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios. Elem Sci Anth, 4, 000116. http://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
5. Peters, C.J., Picardy, J., Darrouzet-Nardi, A. F., Wilkins, J.L., Griffin, T.S. & Fick, G.W. (2016). Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios. Elem Sci Anth, 4, 000116. http://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
Comments
Post a Comment