Organic food is often labelled as superior in terms of its environmental footprint, nutritional quality and taste to regular, conventional food. My previous post discussed the reasons it is hailed as such. But the truth is, it's not the "be-all-end-all" solution to the environmental issues caused by agriculture. A main reason for this is the greater land that organic farming requires. According to Clark & Tilman (2017), organic farms use 25%-110% more land than conventional farms! This is because organic fertilizers like manure are not as effective as synthetic ones since they do not release the specific nutrients needed by plants when they need them. This means that farmers will receive less yield per unit of land and therefore be required to use more land to make the same profits as conventional farmers. (Although, certain organic practices like rotational farming and polyculture have been found to reduce land use.) Photo by Min An from Pexels Another down...
Excellent Initiative! It’s true that we overlook how much eating (and all the auxiliary industries) can have an impact .... and we eat so much!! And waste so much too!! Looking forward to hearing more ������
ReplyDeleteThank you! I will keep updating every week!
DeleteGreat article!! This world has become do commercialised and we need to go back yo basics. Let's make the fill circle. Support local farmers, not GMO foods. But then there is the concern with pesticides etc. So where do we find the right balance..
ReplyDeleteThat's what we're here to discuss!
Delete